Paper reviewer comments example
WebMay 13, 2024 · For example, Taylor & Francis has an “Excellence in Peer Review“ course, and Sense About Science has a “Peer Review Nuts and Bolts“ guide. For journals dealing with … WebReviewer 4 comments: Comment: This is an excellent report dealing with significant technical matters. I find no fault whatsoever with the methods, data analysis, or …
Paper reviewer comments example
Did you know?
WebSep 11, 2024 · Reviewer 1 Comment 1: ‘Hidden Treasure: Scribal Hands in the Notorious Brigantine Manuscript’ was an engaging and informative read and the authors’ … WebApr 1, 2011 · 3. Wait and Gather Your Thoughts. After you read the decision letter from the editor and see the reviewers' comments, take at least a day to allow yourself to process what both the editor and reviewers have said. Then take a fresh look at the comments to determine what the reviewers want to see in a revised paper.
WebThe editors thought it was a study with a large sample size, and the manuscript was clearly written. They also made the following comments: E.2. Reviewer comment: Please consider specifying in the title that this ... 3.1. Reviewer comment: This is a beautifully analysed and written paper, with an important message. I would recommend publication ... WebSample comments Please note that these are just examples of how you might provide feedback on an author’s work. You should, of course, always tailor your review to the …
WebFor example, a paper that holds significance only for a particular subfield of chemical engineering is not appropriate for a broad multidisciplinary journal. Determining match is usually done in partnership with the editor, who can answer questions of journal scope. Analyze your audience WebThe reviewers read the paper and provide comments, suggestions and a recommendation (reject, revise or accept). ... Sample comments. Please note that these are just examples of how you might provide feedback on an author’s work. You should, of course, always tailor your review to the paper in question and the specific requirements of the ...
Webpeer review appears to make papers more readable and improve the general quality of reporting (2 studies), but the evidence for this has very limited generalizability. Authors’ conclusions At present, little empirical evidence is available to support the use of editorial peer review as a mechanism to ensure quality of biomedical research.
Keeping in mind the guidelines above, how do you put your thoughts into words? Here are some sample “before” and “after” reviewer comments ✗ Before “The authors appear to have no idea what they are talking about. I don’t think they have read any of the literature on this topic.” ✓ After “The study fails to address … See more Use an outline for your reviewer report so it’s easy for the editors and author to follow. This will also help you keep your comments organized. Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid. Put the most … See more Giving feedback is hard. Giving effective feedback can be even more challenging. Remember that your ultimate goal is to discuss what the authors would need to do in order to qualify for publication. The point is not to nitpick … See more You might find yourself in a situation where you’re not sure how to explain the problem or provide feedback in a constructive and … See more Be sure you turn in your report on time. Need an extension? Tell the journal so that they know what to expect. If you need a lot of extra time, the … See more bowman gray stadium rulesWebSep 30, 2014 · Reviewers might want to reject a paper that has errors in the affiliation information—in the third line of the manuscript itself . Consider the following inconsistency in affiliation information as an example: University of Wollongong, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Department, Australia gun collection backgroundWebIt is important new reviewers respect previous review comments and the efforts the author has made to revise the paper Ideally, any significant changes should already have been requested in the original review – this subsequent review should be to ensure that the changes have been made, rather than for raising additional issues. bowman gray stadium eventsWebReviewer #2 (Remarks to the Author) The paper describes an experimental advance in the field of electromechanics. Patterned nanobeams made out of silicon nitride and coated … gun collection hobby legalWebDec 17, 2024 · Example: Peer review comments Influence of phone use on sleep Studies show that teens from the US are getting less sleep than they were a decade ago (Johnson, 2024). On average, teens only slept for 6 hours a night in … bowman gray stadium fightWebbackground/literature review. 17. The distinction between racial category and racial markers (16/last/last) needs to be better defined/described and moved to the very beginning of the paper. 18. What “other applications are possible” (17/3/2-3)? 19. The limitations section of the paper is, well, too limited (see my comments throughout). bowman gray stadium stock rulesWebNov 3, 2024 · Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The present manuscript refers to the review on TVC studies using many previous existing results. If the authors want to publish … bowman gray stadium schedule